The documented contrast

One wildlife agency. Two standards?

CPW has specific language for raptor buffers, seasonal closures, intact elk habitat, and development near sensitive wildlife. Sweetwater deserves the same specificity when CPW is the agency seeking to manage and develop the project.

CPW’s mission begins “to perpetuate the wildlife resources of the state.” Strategic Plan, p. 11

01

Sweetwater · CPW Area 8 · August 2021

CPW said it should set the example.

“CPW is attempting to bring deer and elk numbers back up in this DAU and as an agency we should set the example when it comes to development in sensitive habitat.”

That same staff record describes elk winter habitat, calving ground, deer-fawning ground, raptor nesting areas, and seasonal protection measures at Sweetwater.

Read CPW Area 8’s comments
02

Ami’s Acres · August 2026

For a private development, CPW sought a raptor survey and buffer guidance.

The Aspen Daily News reported that CPW Area Wildlife Manager Matt Yamashita recommended a raptor-nest survey for a proposed 98-home development near Glenwood Springs and, if nests were found, use of the state’s buffer-zone guidance.

The question at Sweetwater: which comparable, site-specific nest protections will CPW identify for its own project?

Read the Aspen Daily News report
03

Fishers Peak State Park

At another CPW park, the Peregrine Falcon protection is concrete.

CPW’s Fishers Peak regulation directs visitors to remain outside a posted one-half-mile Peregrine Falcon nest buffer from March 15 through July 31. CPW’s recent reporting says summit access reopens after the nesting-season closure when young falcons have fledged and reached independence.

Fishers Peak is not Sweetwater. The question is why CPW cannot state the location, season, and enforceable protection appropriate for Sweetwater.

04

Roan Plateau elk · September 2026

CPW’s director described fragmented habitat and recreation pressure as likely elk pressures.

The Post Independent reported Director Laura Clellan’s comments that degraded habitat conditions, habitat fragmentation, and increasing recreation were likely drivers of declining calf-to-cow ratios in the Yellow Creek herd.

At Sweetwater, CPW Area 8 warned that year-round disturbance from an admin/employee site would discourage elk use and further reduce shrinking elk winter habitat.

Read the Roan Plateau report
05

CPW’s Sweetwater scoping record · August 2024

CPW asked for protections to be applied and enforced.

“Applying & enforcing seasonal timing limitations on human activities in sensitive wildlife habitats;”
“Applying & enforcing no surface occupancy buffers to sensitive locations;”

The Commission should now ask CPW to identify the Sweetwater locations, dates, conditions, and enforcement mechanism those words require.

Read CPW’s scoping comment

Put the question to CPW

Ask the Commission for one clear written standard.

Use the direct record. Ask what will apply at Sweetwater, where it will apply, and how it will be enforced.

Write the Commission