The leverage point

Put Sweetwater before the people who set CPW policy.

This is not a vote count. Ask the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission and Colorado legislators for a public written answer: what wildlife protections will apply at Sweetwater, where will they be binding, and who will enforce them?

Put it before decision-makers

Use the channels with authority.

The Commission is the Governor-appointed citizen board that sets CPW regulations and policies. The General Assembly’s agriculture and natural-resources committees have legislative oversight responsibility for the Department of Natural Resources, which includes CPW.

Recommended talking points

Lead with CPW’s own words. Then ask for an answer.

“[A]s an agency we should set the example when it comes to development in sensitive habitat.”

Ask whether the Commission agrees—and what that example requires at Sweetwater.

“This area falls within the CPW nest buffers of the bald eagle (400m) and peregrine falcon (800m) nests.”

Ask CPW to identify the applicable nest protections, dates, and locations in writing.

“Applying & enforcing seasonal timing limitations on human activities in sensitive wildlife habitats.”

Ask which seasonal limits CPW will require, and where they will be enforceable.

“Thoughtful site design to avoid adverse impacts on big game current use of the parcel is critical.”

Ask which facilities, access routes, or operating periods CPW will avoid or change to protect elk and mule deer.

All quotations are from CPW’s Sweetwater comments and scoping record. Read the documents and page references →

A message you can personalize

Ask for one public written response.

Subject: Sweetwater Lake — require CPW’s wildlife protections in writing

Dear Commissioners:

I am asking the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission to direct CPW staff to provide a public written response on Sweetwater Lake wildlife protections.

CPW’s own Sweetwater record says that “as an agency we should set the example when it comes to development in sensitive habitat.” It identifies Bald Eagle and Peregrine Falcon nest buffers, seasonal no-surface-occupancy periods, elk winter and calving habitat, and mule-deer fawning habitat. CPW’s 2024 scoping comment also calls for “applying & enforcing” seasonal timing limits and no-surface-occupancy buffers in sensitive wildlife habitat.

Please require CPW to answer these questions publicly:

1. Which site-specific raptor buffers, seasonal restrictions, and closure areas will CPW apply at Sweetwater?
2. Which development locations, access routes, and operating periods will CPW avoid or modify for elk and mule deer?
3. Where will those measures be enforceable, including project authorizations and operating requirements?
4. How will CPW monitor compliance and report results to the public?

Sweetwater deserves the same specificity CPW uses when it asks other projects to protect wildlife.

Sincerely,
[Your name]
[Your town]
Open Commission form

Personalize the message. Be specific, respectful, and ask for a written answer.

A focused legislative request

Ask your lawmakers to request the same answer.

“Please ask Colorado Parks and Wildlife for a public written response identifying the Sweetwater Lake raptor and ungulate protections it will require, where they will be enforceable, and how compliance will be monitored.”

The central demand

Use CPW’s science. Require a written answer.

Sweetwater’s wildlife protections should be clear before CPW proceeds—not left as an intention to sort out later.

Review the record